Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul | | ♠ | A 9 4 | | ♥ | A J 9 5 | | ♦ | 10 4 | | ♣ | 10 8 4 2 | |
| ♠ | J | | ♥ | Q 4 | | ♦ | K Q 9 8 3 | | ♣ | A K 7 5 3 | | | | | | | ♠ | K Q 8 7 6 5 | | ♥ | K 8 6 | | ♦ | 6 5 | | ♣ | 9 6 | |
|
| | ♠ | 10 3 2 | | ♥ | 10 7 3 2 | | ♦ | A J 7 2 | | ♣ | Q J | |
EW 2♠; W 2♦; W 2♣; NS 1♥; E 1♦; E 1♣; Par −110
| West | North | East | South |
| | | 2 ♠ | Pass |
| 3 ♦ | All pass | | |
In most partnerships 3D is forcing. Presumably this was intended here as there is little reason to play in a 5 card suit at the 3 level, vs a known 6 card suit at the 2 level. The hand doesn't really qualify for a bid. As can be seen from the DDA 2S is the best contract yet East is maximum for his bid. In West's position u need to think about 'covers', ie how many losers in pard's hand can u cover. Even with a max as above there are ~7 losers so u need 4 covers to think game maybe on. West probably only has 3 covers and should just pass.
My recommended auction:
ReplyDelete2S all pass
2S is 6-10 with six spades
West has 15 hcp but without a fit this is not enough to force to game. You maybe unhappy playing in the 6=1 spade fit but there is no guarantee that 3D will be any better - it could be but it also could be a lot worse.