Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul | | ♠ | A 9 7 5 4 3 2 | | ♥ | — | | ♦ | J 9 8 | | ♣ | K Q 6 | |
| ♠ | K J | | ♥ | J 3 | | ♦ | A K 7 5 | | ♣ | A 9 5 4 3 | | | | | | | ♠ | Q 8 6 | | ♥ | K Q 10 7 6 5 | | ♦ | Q 10 6 | | ♣ | 2 | |
|
| | ♠ | 10 | | ♥ | A 9 8 4 2 | | ♦ | 4 3 2 | | ♣ | J 10 8 7 | |
EW 4♥; EW 2N; EW 2♦; Par −620
| West | North | East | South |
| | | 2 ♥ | Pass |
| 4 ♥ | Pass | Pass | Dbl |
| All pass | | | |
With 4 cover cards west may want to check on how strong the weak 2 is. Most do this by way of a 2 NT query. This may depend on the partnership agreement as to how weak the weak 2 can be vulnerable. If one assumes that if pard has KQxxxx, and a off suit queen as a min, then game is still likely and could be bid direct.
South does not have a penalty X, as the hearts are likely to be only 2 tricks, and no reason to believe North has two tricks.
At another table North bid 4S and east bid 5H which was doubled. East,s 5H bid is just a rebid of what he has already told his pard he has, whereas west could have been raising the pre-empt with a weak hand or have a strong hand bidding to make. Clearly west should be captain in this situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment